Home Faq Email Contact Help? Clients Brochure Blog
NORMAN TAYLOR
California Lemon Law
Call or Click Here for a FREE Consultation
Se Habla Español:
1-877-SOURCAR 768-7227
Home
Lemon Law Wins
About Our Firm
Lemon Law Explained
What Can I Do?
Talk to an Expert
Contact Us
Lemon Law Claims
Lemon Law News
The Lemon Car
Lemon Law FAQ
Free Brochure
Testimonials
RV / Motor Home
Links & Resources
State Reference    expand
Lemon Law Glossary
Free Case Review
"I chose your firm because everyone I spoke to said you are known as the authorities on California Lemon Law. The service you provide reflects this."
What is a Lemon Car?
Check to see if any of these options apply to your car. If they do, you may have a case:
  • rough idle
  • transmission
  • rough shifting
  • stalling
  • check engine light on
  • vehicle surges
Precedent Setting Lemon Law Wins

Hayes v. GMC and Tustin Chevrolet

Consumer Award Calculations, Jiagbogu v. Mercedes Benz

Lemon Law Victory Spotlights GM Public Relations Disaster

Superior Court judge upholds largest "Lemon Law" jury verdict in California, Forest vs. BMW of North America

Another Important Win for Norman Taylor & Associates

In Hayes v. GMC and Tustin Chevrolet we have a classic Song-Beverly Act case that demonstrates what Mr. Taylor describes in his book on the Lemon Law as the "lemon Gauntlet". The essential facts in that case were:

  • The new car was delivered with significant rust to brake lines, rear spindle and lower control arm. An expert stated that the vehicle was exposed to a chemically corrosive material.
  • GM denied repair under warranty. They asserted that the rust problem was not covered by the warranty.
  • GM attempted one repair, as a "goodwill gesture". The attempted repair did not correct the problem.
  • Mr. Hayes undertook arbitration through the Better Business Bureau (BBB).
  • Even though the GM representative said they could not correct the problem, the mediator awarded the manufacturer another repair attempt.
  • GM refused to communicate to Mr. Hayes what they intended to do to repair the problem, despite repeated attempts by Mr. Hayes to get this information.
  • GM said it was the dealer's problem and they have no control over what the dealer did or did not do.
  • Dealer gave the Hayes the runaround (the gauntlet in action).
  • Finally the dealer said they would grind away the rust; this was another improper repair attempt.
  • Thereafter Mr. Hayes made several more attempts to get the problem properly corrected.
  • The proper solution would have been to replace the rusted components. GM and the dealership never offered to provide this remedy.
  • Mr. Hayes files suit.
  • On resolution of the case the jury found for the plaintiff and awarded $27,000.00 for replacement cost of the vehicle and 2X this amount, $57,000.00 for civil penalty


Home About Us Contact Us Disclaimer Can I Win?

Copyright © 2009 Norman Taylor & Associates All rights reserved.